Archive for the ‘Examples’ Category

Should I Get Sociology Essays Free?   no comments

Have you ever had problems with writing an essay on some obscure sociological topic? If yes, there is nothing to be surprised about – it is discipline that is notorious for its many complexities. Students, especially the ones that lack enthusiasm about this subject and experience in writing essays are sure to have difficulties with writing a good sociological imagination essay at the first dash.

If it isn’t important for you to learn how to write on sociological topics you may try getting sociology essays free, which is quite easy nowadays. The Internet is rife with websites offering you all kinds of essays and other texts free of charge, and it is sometimes quite a tempting offer. It is, however, quite natural that works presented on these sites are of mediocre quality at the very best and, what is even more important, their gratuitous nature results in them being used by hundreds of people. Which means that if you try to hand one of them in as your own work you have all chances of bumping into a professor who has already seen this particular sociological imagination essay.

That is why, in case you really want to succeed in your sociology course, you should either learn how to write essays on your own or find a really good freelance writer to do your work in your stead. The first variant saves your money and makes you sure you know what is written in your latest text, the second saves your time and gives you an opportunity to do things you really want to do. It is indispensable in case there are some other activities in addition to studying sociology you want to participate in.

Just don’t use sociology essays free as your own and everything will be fine.

Written by admin on October 1st, 2012

Admission Essay Writing   no comments

Getting an opportunity to college entrance is getting harder each day, as there are many applicants competing for limited chances. To ensure there are high chances of getting a college admission, the applicant must present a standard admission essay; this is because an admission essay means either the applicant’s rejection or acceptance to the college. Therefore, an admission essay writing by the applicants should be unique and of high quality. They should be brief and convincing to the reader. Applicants should make sure they write new admission essays every time they seek for new college admissions. The applicants should not copy their admission essay from other applicants; this is because each applicant is different from the other and they have different reasons for joining the colleges of their choice. Admission essays explain the reasons for an applicant to have a desire to seek admission for various courses in universities and colleges. An admission essay should convince the admission panels that the applicant is unique form all the other applicants. Applicants should make sure that their admission essay describes their favorite activities and tell stories about them. The admission essay should capture reader’s interest and attention, which shows that the applicant that they are unique. An admission essay should include more information that applicants wish the panel to know about them that is included in the application form. The admission essay should be persuasive and convincing the reader that they deserve the admission. The applicants should use the admission essay to explain why they wish to join the college. In the admission essay, the applicant should show a positive attitude as to why they want to get the admission.

Written by admin on November 2nd, 2011

Tagged with , ,

Sample Essay on Family Matters   no comments

Posted at 2:53 pm in Examples

America is known as “the land of opportunity.” It is a country where millions have come to seek wealth, prosperity, and a fulfilling life. One of the most important ways of achieving these high aspirations is getting a quality education. Although America has reformed its education system over the past century in order to better the quality and to achieve equality among schools, there still are drastic differences between schools in America. There are also great differences in educational outcomes among students in America.

There are many advantages when a child is growing up in wealthy family. First is cultural capital where white color parent teaches the child how to communicate, behave or think properly, so then they would feel comfortable in classroom. Second is social capital where knowing people who are willing to help you when you get stuck. For example, if your teacher is a friend of your parent. Third is achievement expectation where a child is expected to do well in school. The next is control over their environment, meaning that middle or upper class children are rewarded for getting good grades. Unlike working class children whose parents are powerless will not expect any reward and rarely will try to accomplish. Also family size is the issue in students’ achievements. The less people there are in the household the better the results in studding going to be. It is better for a child to have two adults in the family unit because single parents might have greater financial need. Neighborhood is also a great factor in child’s success. I think better neighborhood will yield a child getting good test scores. In the black and Hispanic location there are higher crime rate and abuse. This might affect child’s ability to learn and stay in school.

Children of upper and middle class families tend to achieve more than the children of lower and working class families. This greater achievement of the upper and middle class allows those students to continue their education in college, which then allows them to get prestigious and well paying jobs. The lower class children, due to their low achievement in school, typically do not go on to college and therefore are left with low skilled, low paying jobs.

Read the rest of this entry »

Written by admin on November 18th, 2010

Tagged with , ,

Essay “Can Sociology be Called a Science?”   no comments

Posted at 1:38 pm in Examples

Definite laws that dictate everything govern the natural world of such things as physics, chemistry and geology. These laws are observed through experimentation and study, which allows us to understand these ‘positive facts’. Many argue that the search for a collection of facts and laws should not be limited to the natural world, but extended to human society. One such person was French mathematician, Auguste Comte. In the nineteenth century he foresaw a science of society that would discover the laws that govern us. This has led to the creation of positivist sociology, the belief that laws of behaviour govern human society. But to what extent is this true?

Positivist sociology seeks to create a research programme that parallel’s that of the natural sciences and aims to find either direct evidence of linked occurrences in society or at least strong correlations. For instance, a sociologist may investigate a possible link between the attendance at parents’ evening and the child’s educational attainment. Many think this is unrealistic and naпve. The work on suicide by one of the most famous positivist sociologists, Durkheim, is often used to argue this case. He found that the cause for suicide is not family, religion or politics, but something immeasurable, the extent of integration and moral regulation in society. This however, could also suggest that sociology can correspond to the narrow definition of science as general and concerned with identifying clearly observable causes and correlations. Despite the problems in doing so, the idea of a science for society is appealing to many, and began to emerge fully in the nineteenth century. Marx wrote, ‘the material transformation of the economic conditions of production which can be determined with the precision of natural science’. He also believed that his view of how socialism would emerge from capitalism was not merely utopian, but based on scientific analysis of historical development.

Read the rest of this entry »

Written by admin on November 17th, 2010

Tagged with , ,

The Sixties Drug Movement essay   no comments

Posted at 2:59 pm in Examples

Since the mid 1960’s, when youthful drug use began to make headlines, the entire issue has been debated with growing emotion and hysteria on all sides. The communications media, in their overwhelming, exhaustive, and sometimes boring coverage of the drug problem, have given the general public a certain amount of insight into the nature of drug taking among today’s youth. Which drugs are being taken, how, when, where, and by whom are aspects of the issue which have been thoroughly discussed. The background leading to the current craze, the reasons why the young were and are so amenable to drug-taking, and the attitudes which have made drugs a symbol of the current generation have yet to be objectively analyzed, at least in the mass media. Too much emphasis is usually placed on one or two aspects or factors of the issue; the drug phenomenon of the late sixties is actually a very complex combination of the influence of specific people and events with the general social atmosphere and attitudes of an age of change and confusion.

Drug-taking has always existed in American society, but in this century it has basically been limited to certain elements: the ghetto dweller, the derelict, the drifter, certain individuals in the world of art, music, show business, and some wealthy, usually young and psychologically disturbed, thrill seekers (a few of which I encountered during my years at boarding school). The drug culture was hidden and ignored, alien to the vast American middle class. The Beatniks of the fifties and the pre-hippie types of the early sixties experimented with drugs, especially marijuana. Though many of these people were children of the middle-class, they represented a miniscule group and did not receive much publicity. When they were noticed, they were regarded with a mixture of amusement and contempt; no one paid much attention. Read the rest of this entry »

Categorization in the Media essay   no comments

Posted at 2:50 pm in Examples

Categorization, the process by which distinct entities are treated as equivalent, is one of the most fundamental and pervasive cognitive activities. It is fundamental because categorization allows us to understand and make predictions about objects and events in our world. The problem of understanding what criteria are used to group together entities in the same category is indeed central in categorization. Though most works on this topic have proposed that perceptual or structural similarity is the “glue” that binds objects of a same category, some psychologists have claimed that similarity is insufficient to account for the acquisition and use of categories and have proposed more abstract forms of criteria that make categories coherent and give them a kind of homogeneity in terms of the entities that belong to them.

The purpose of this study was to explore Caucasian viewers’ identification and misidentification of criminals featured in a newscast. Based on prior research in social cognition, it was predicted that viewers’ identification memory would vary as a function of the race of the criminal suspect featured, the race of the foils, and the viewer’s endorsement of anti-Black attitudes. Read the rest of this entry »